Rocks In His Head?

If you were to judge Edgar Bronfman, Jr. strictly on his track record as a media executive, you might conclude that the fact he believes he’s qualified to steer a studio as troubled as Paramount in 2024 might suggest he probably has imbibed a bit too often in the products his family has produced for decades.  And the last time I had a shot of Seagram’s whisky, I know I felt its potency for quite some time.

Bronfman fils did have roughly five years at the helm of Universal Pictures in the latter part of the 1990s, eventually folding in the assets of Polygram as well.  It was, to be kind, not the most robust era in its history.  On the theatrical side, its releases were rife with poorly produced and even more poorly received IP repurposings and remakes, including SERGEANT BILKO, MCHALE’S NAVY, THE NUTTY PROFESSOR, PSYCHO, LEAVE IT TO BEAVER, THE BLUES BROTHERS (2000!), DUDLEY DO-RIGHT and BABE.  You don’t recall seeing them in the theatres or seeking them out recently on demand, either, do you?  On the TV side, arguably the best move his team made was to integrate Polygram’s sleeper reality show BLIND DATE into their bland mix of tepid first-run shows that included the punchline duo of HERCULES and XENA: WARRIOR PRINCESS.

But he does have money, or at least access to it, which is enough for him to have enough street cred to throw yet another monkey wrench into the sale of what fellow nepo baby Shari Redstone turned Paramount Global into on her watch, culminating with an eleventh hour and fifty-third minute bid submitted mere hours before the window of opportunity expired

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL needed both Lauren Thomas and Jessica Toonkel to shed light on this yesterday:
Bronfman has submitted a $4.3 billion offer for National Amusements, the company through which Redstone’s family controls the media giant, and a minority stake in Paramount Global, according to people familiar with the situation.  In a letter to Charles Phillips, chair of Paramount’s special committee of directors, Bronfman wrote that his investor group believes that Paramount’s business is “far more valuable” than what Skydance is paying. He also wrote in the letter, which was viewed by The Wall Street Journal, that his proposal “eliminates the risks, uncertainties and costs of combining Paramount with Skydance.”  
Bronfman, who formerly ran Warner Music and liquor giant Seagram, said in a separate letter to Phillips that he has secured financing commitments of about $5 billion from an array of individuals and companies including Fortress Investment Group; BC Partners Credit, crypto investor and former child actor Brock Pierce; longtime activist investor Jeff Ubben and his wife, Laura Ubben; and Duty Free Americas Chairman Simon Falic.
People with money.  But not people with experience in entertainment.
But wait, there are more names involved that do have at least some media experience, as the Journal ladies later revealed:
Bronfman estimates that his team, which includes film producer Steven Paul; longtime media executive Jon Miller, a partner at Advancit Capital, Shari Redstone’s private-equity firm; and John Martin, the former CEO of Turner, can achieve $3 billion in cost savings.
Steven Paul’s resume includes the likes of BRATZ and two installments of GHOST RIDER.  Martin was elevated to CEO from a financial position and ran the company at a time when it was shedding talent and assets prior to its eventual merger with AT&T.  I don’t think one needs to assume how and why Miller has a stake at this table.
Do any of these folks have anything on their collective CVs that compare favorably to what David Ellison and Skydance have produced, how Jeff Shell managed Universal mericifully long enough after the stench of the Bronfman era to be able to enact real change, or even someone like Jeff Zucker, connected through his involvement with RedBird Capital?
So while the Skydance team has already quietly begun to set wheels in motion to revamp CBS News toward a streaming-centric model, one that Shell successfully instituted at NBC, Bronfman and company had the time to perhaps figure out some sort of a game plan that might at least indicate they have given it some thought.
But here’s all they shared yesterday, per the LOS ANGELES TIMES’ Meg James:
Bronfman’s group believes it could save another $3 billion in costs by boosting profits in the streaming division, employing artificial intelligence in business functions and “right sizing the bloated corporate structure,” according to their letter.
Bloated corporate structure?  Aside from the three-headed Office of the CEO, who’s left after the bloodbath that has already occurred?
But investors care little about human beings, either employees or creatives.  They care about stock results.  And on that standard, Bronfman’s actually on a bit of a hot streak.  See, he happens to currently be the chairman of FUBO Sports.  And they’ve been in the news cycle lately as well.  Per FORTUNE’s David Meyer:

It’s a good time to be an investor in the sports and entertainment streaming service Fubo, whose share price leapt 17% late Friday before climbing a further 23% this morning.

Fubo’s surge is the result of its Friday antitrust victory (for now) over Venu, the sports app joint venture between ESPN, Fox, and Warner Bros. Discovery. Venu was going to become available later this week at the price of $42.99 a month, but that’s on hold now—a development that could save Fubo from imminent doom.

Doom that was developed over the nearly four years of existence under Bronfman’s watch, and that were it not to for this favorable ruling, as they testified,  would have gone bankrupt by the first quarter of 2025.

Ahh, there’s that track record again.

The remaining people at Paramount companies, and certainly the legacies of those already departed, deserve a better fate than someone with Bronfman’s track record and vision offer.  They just survived another 70-ish second generation scion with little ability beyond legal maneuverings.  Just because he’s probably a better bartender shouldn’t make him a better steward.

Until next time…

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x