I Know It’s Spelled R-A-M-A-N. Ramen’s Cheap. Just Like Talk.

You’ll need to try and forgive me if I’m not quite as exuberant about the blue tsunami as perhaps those in areas where candidates with track records and/or broad visions drove that sea change.  Nithya Raman will soon be the mayor of Los Angeles, and other than the fact she is not Karen Bass I’m at a loss to try and explain why.

Raman finally emerged victorious over Bass early Friday in a manner similar to how she first qualified as a Democrat-on-democrat challenger in June: outsized support from early voters whose choices were not part of the overnight results, disproportionately connected to artsier, younger and gentrifying neighborhoods.  At that time her main rival was the former reality star Spencer Pratt who had even less experience than she did and enough cred with the D.C. power base to have its leadership clamoring for investigations.  I painstakingly explained then how the math actually worked out in the hopes of shutting them up.  Fortunately, this particularly odious person is now a moot point so I don’t need to reiterate that exercise.

But other than a focus on a singular issue that mostly involves folks  ineligible to vote I can’t find too many reasons beyond being a lesser of two evils that she wound up with those numbers in her favor.  Even the usually sympathetic POLITICO struggled, as evidence by the profile dropped last weekend by Will McCarthy:

It has been nearly a century since Los Angeles has elected a mayor with such scant experience in the city’s civic life…Unlike New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani, to whom she is frequently compared, Raman did not build her base by fusing her identity with an existing movement or by capturing mass attention through mastery of online communication. Instead, she pursued the type of civic engagement that plays out in claustrophobic public-library meeting rooms rather than celebrity-packed rallies or viral memes. Raman built her standing on an issue rather than a banner or a brand, zeroing in on one of Los Angeles’ longest-running, most intractable problems — street homelessness.

But Raman has struggled to meld her activist origin story and her political education on City Council to make the case that she is prepared to run a city of nearly four million people. Her relationship with the Democratic Socialists eroded as she broke with them on issues like Israel…Her stint atop the housing and homelessness committee has been panned by colleagues…”It was the most unproductive time I’ve had on council,” said councilmember Imelda Padilla of her time on the committee. “There’s no way to rephrase that.”

Even some of the grassroots, homelessness-focused organizations that one would expect to serve as the core of Raman’s constituency are unsure about her candidacy. Some point to Raman’s record of DIY activism — and the way she came to fuse her concern for the poor with a pro-construction mentality that could benefit private developers — as reasons not to trust her.

And then there’s this “testimonial” from one of her technical constituents who resides in the portion that was added on midway through her term that represents a more family-centric and somewhat older base of actual homeowners:

Looks like Raman will be the mayor of LA.  Here’s what we can expect, based on living in her City Council district or a while: potholes, unfilled; crimes against property, uninvestigated and/or unprosecuted; graffiti, everywhere with no mitigation; park flooding, erosion and littering, unaddressed; city library system, underfunded and poorly-maintained; vital repairs and maintenance, delayed; Department of Water and Power, rates increased and contingency funds raided for mayoral pet projects. Prediction: Los Angeles will look back at this egotistical ideologue and declare her the least effective mayor in the city’s history.
I’ll add that this person has more than a half-century of experience covering politicians and newsmakers coast-to-coast, so this is a tad more than merely yet another sh-tpost.  This person may be seasoned–ok, old–but certainly not dumb.
But ok, will of the people, democracy rules, and maybe not quite as Jewish-ignorant as, say, Mamdami.  And compared to Bass, whose questionable priorities as my congresswoman accelerated me losing my home and nearly my life.  she’s a relative godsend.  Personally, I draw more comparisons for her to AOC, who was also elected as a refreshingly needed choice to an incum-petent with support from one portion of a widended district where she continues to ignore the needs and wishes of those who didn’t back her in the first place.  Fortunately for the sake of this country she’s still one of 435 voices in a choir.   With a Super Bowl and an Olympics on the immediate horizon, Raman will soon actually be in a far more visible and influential position than any of them.
So I’m begrudgingly willing to give her a chance, albeit with an extremely short leash.  So I’d like ask what she plans to do to help sway our incoming governor Xavier Beccera on this line item which I suspect to the wife of a scripted series writer means a bit more than nothing.  As THE WRAP’s Tess Patton authored last Friday:
The upcoming “Grey’s Anatomy” Texas spinoff will shoot in Albuquerque, New Mexico instead of California despite repeated attempts from the producers to keep the production in Hollywood. Shondaland executive producer and creative partner Betsy Beers testified at an Assembly Committee hearing in North Hollywood last week, upset by the limitations and unpredictability of the state’s film and television tax credit system. The upcoming spinoff was rejected twice for a California tax credit, delaying the start of production for the ABC and 20th Television medical drama.
Beers claimed that Shondaland’s record of creating long-running shows that employed hundreds of cast and crew members in California did not have any bearing on whether or not they received the tax credit. The producer also noted in her fiery Oct. 29 speech that the tax credit was particularly challenging to get for a new show. She said that the team lost time, personnel and money fighting to stay in L.A.
“Ironically, a few years ago, I was awarded the California Golden State Award for keeping jobs in LA,” she concluded. “I’m here to say, please, please look at metrics and factors when deciding who gets credit, and please increase what’s available. If it all boils down to numbers, all you are going to have is movies coming in and out of here, and the advantages we have discovered with long-running shows will be gone.”
I’d like to think Raman has given this more than merely a second or two of thought.  I’d suspect many of her East Side constituents have been trying in vain for roles in front or behind the cameras for years.  I know plenty of Beers’ peers live in the area that was referenced earlier as being pothole and graffiti-infested.  Surely at some point someone might have mentioned this issue–not to mention others not quite as repeatedly tone-deaf and insulting.  Had Raman spent a little bit of time offering solutions to problems like this rather than reinforcing Bass’ shortcomings I might have actually considered voting for her myself.
I Know It’s Spelled R-A-M-A-N.  Ramen’s Cheap.  Just Like Talk.In the wake of her election the ASSOCIATED PRESS reiterated the rhetoric that has so incensed her constituent.  It’s not even worth excerpting.  But the campaign is now over.  She’s got time and, most of all, reason, to give cases like Beers’ more than mere afterthought.  Start caring about those who don’t want to wind up on her priority list.   Start NOW, Nithya.  Soup’s already getting cold.
Until next time…
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x